Highest paying jobs in America STEM Field. Information useful for students.

Highest paying jobs in America STEM Field. Information useful for students. In recent times STEM fields have proven to be the direction to follow if you want to earn big and live comfortably within a job description. If you are confused about what the acronym STEM stands for it represents science, technology, engineering, and math. Careers in these fields have proven to pull in large checks at the end of the working year and for anyone seeking to get into high earning careers, they should consider any of the careers within the STEM. It has been projected that STEM-related fields will grow by 18% in 2018 while most of the other fields are given an estimated growth of 9%. Therefore, this happens to be the very best time to get into a STEM field. The data that was compiled by Glassdoor looking at highest paying jobs in 2017 showed clearly that most of the high earners were STEM-related fields. Let’s see below some of the jobs that made the list and how much money can be earned when you work in any one of these fields. Systems Engineer System Engineers work in the Tech industry, we have very well known companies that have thrived and are leading as multibillion-dollar companies. Companies like Facebook, Google, Amazon, Alibaba, and many other smaller startups. Systems Engineers also have been seen to thrive well in other big institutions like banks, universities, and corporations. Some of the work descriptions of the systems Engineer include hardware integration, systems maintenance, and system updates. The yearly salary is estimated to be around $78,364 yearly and certainly does seem appetizing for most people wanting to be in a career that provides big earnings. UX Designer When you are in the market for creating a new app and do not know where or how to go about it then certainly you will need to enlist the help of a UX designer. UX designing companies are responsible for the conducting research which they put together through interviews and surveys. These they further summarize prototypes, storyboards, and workflows. The estimated salary of UX designers stands at $78,756. Definitely, this seems like a cool and a huge paycheck that can guarantee some measure of comfort. Software Engineer When you hear about software creation then you talking about software Engineers, they are also involved in the building process like database design, and applications. Most of the devices we use are all embedded with different types of software whether in our computers, phones or even transport services like Uber. They are said to earn about $85,552 which is a really cool cash to earn working. Product Manager The product manager as the name implies is responsible for managing a product. Their services can be seen in either providing services app or hardware if it is a Tech firm, like the Smartphones and computers. We can say that the job description of a product manager includes product introduction, product requirements and organizing the marketing strategy and research. They link all the phases of marketing and tech. The salary is $90,693 not a bad paycheck to go home with. Data Scientist Today’s world is revolving around data. A data scientist’s job is to look at a data then analyze them and make predictions. These data are used to analyze trends and customers behavior and as well can be used to shape the way people feel and think about something. The importance of data cannot be overemphasized. Data scientists can be found in various types of industries from sports, fashion, tech and food industries. They have been seen as top earners cashing in around $96,823 yearly. Solution Architect Tech solutions are developed by solution architects. Before any tech solution can become ready, background works must have been done by the architects who would organize the necessary requirements for it. Building the architecture of the process and implementing it is all the job of a solution architect. They earned a median salary of about $101,930, a good income to say the least. Comfortable job choice you would agree, for anyone seeking a career in this field. Pharmacist When you go over to the medicine store the pharmacist is the person that gives you the medications you want from the medicine store as directed by a doctor. They can also direct patients on how to use the drugs if such a patient does not understand the directives from the doctor’s notes. Pharmacists are found in most hospitals and some other times in drugs stores around the country. They are categorized as one of the high paying jobs and have attracted so many people to this filed. So studying to become a pharmacist is not a bad idea. They are estimated to go home with a median base salary of about $126,989. It is, therefore, safe to say if anyone wants to have a comfortable life working in a high earning job then focusing on courses that guarantee a job in the STEM is the direction to follow.

buy custom Illegal Drugs essay

buy custom Illegal Drugs essay Most serious terrorist crimes are funded by illegal drugs like marijuana. However, its prohibition does not reduce this risk. In fact, prohibition acts as a catalyst to the growth of these cartels. This is because the cartels are not afraid of the war on marijuana. The prohibition leads to better prices and elimination of the smaller and inefficient cartels. The U.S interdiction efforts are therefore laughable since the prohibition only led to elimination of the obligation to pay tax. To the cartels, the only thr4eta to their business is guidance and counseling efforts aimed at dissuading people from taking marijuana. This can also be affirmed by the fact that lifting of alcohol ban in 1933 led to reduced murders and robberies. This implies that legalization of marijuana can lead to reduced crime incidences associated with it. Lifting of the ban on marijuana would give the cartel owners a legal way of solving business disagreements hence reducing murder and violent crimes. In the pre sent scenario, marijuana traders do not have a legal mechanism for settling their disputes and hence crime and murder remains their only alternatives. Prohibition of marijuana can only serve to increase corruption since police are tempted to take bribes in order to allow the trade to go on. Moreover, illegalization of the drug only serves to increase its price. This makes its users to commit more crimes in order to obtain the drug (Swlearning.com) According to a report from white house office of drug control policy, anti-marijuana efforts have not had any significant results on the reduction of the drug in the streets. Therefore, children are continually exposed to marijuana. Moreover, the dealers show off to children making the children to have the urge to get rich quickly. The children affected hence chose marijuana trade as opposed to legitimate jobs or even continuing with their education. Decriminalization of the drug would eliminate the drug traffickers who act as role models to young children. Lack of regulation in marijuana trade has resulted to many unregulated marijuana cartels .the cartels lure children into the trade. A study conducted in 2006 by national drug use and health (NSDUH) indicated that over 800000 adolescents are involved in the trade. The survey also indicated thatthe prevalence of a student having been given or offered marijuana at school ranges from 15.5- 38.7 percent. In 2005, the governments spent around 7 billion dollars to arrest and prosecute individuals for marijuana offences. However, the efforts did not bear fruits as studies show that more than 80 percent of high school students find obtain marijuana easily (Studyworld.com). Prohibition of marijuana does not work. Although a lot of money is spent in this effort, marijuana only becomes more available, less expensive and more potent. Studies have indicated that 81 percent of people aged 45 years in the US have used marijuana. Prohibition efforts have failed to reduce its consumption, violent crimes associated with its consumption and its distribution in the streets. The efforts have also not reduced its availability to its potential users nor has it reduced the profits obtained by the underground cartels through its trade. The current policy of prohibition only serves to marginalize and stigmatize marijuana users. This in turn inhibits their efforts to be productive or become gainfully employed. The policy also prohibits such people from seeking treatment against marijuana abuse for fear of being arrested. The users therefore continue suffering in darkness until they die out of its abuse (Frank 456). The government should not have a right to regulate what people do in private. People should be free to do what they want with their lives even if it is taking recreational drugs as long as this causes no harm to others. The government has no right to prevent or impose punishment on marijuana consumers since drug use is a victimless crime. Otherwise the government should also forbid overreacting since it causes more deaths than marijuana use annually. People who support the ban on the use of marijuana cite the public opinion. The current marijuana prohibition was imposed due to strong public support for political measures against irresponsible use of marijuana which presented unacceptable levels of harm to the users. The burden was eventually being transferred to the society. The public also sees marijuana use as a vice .it is a sign of weakness. The community therefore argues that it has a right to protect itself from the harm tthat can be caused by ma4rijuana users. Hence, the society sees continued prohibition as the only way to guard itself from the threat posed by the users. Gallup conducted a research in 2009 that indicated that 54 percent of the US population was against legalization of marijuana. Similar results were obtained in Australia where 79 percent of the population was found to be against its legalization (James 42). Organizations have also argued that marijuana should continue being prohibited since it poses health risks to the users. The government purports that marijuana is more dangerous than alcohol by up to six times. Marijuana has also been found to be more powerful than ever before. In the year 2000 the number of cases that were in need of emergency treatment for use of marijuana was more than six times higher than that of 1990 despite the fact that the number of users had not increased significantly. In 1999, 2500000 Americans were enrolled for drug abuse treatment against marijuana. Furthermore, marijuana also exposes its users to the threat of cancer. Marijuana has been found to contain 400 harmful chemicals including those found in cigars. Marijuanas short term effects are equally harmful. It results to loss of memory, low perception, the users find it hard to think and make decisions. Marijuana use also leads to loss of memory strength, increase in heart rate and anxiety. It is for t his reason that organizations have advocated for its continued prohibition (Hanford 16). It is true that the usage of marijuana poses a lot of threat both to the users and the society. It is a great health risk. The individuals who consume marijuana cannot be allowed to harm themselves or the members of the society. However, this cannot be done through prohibiting its use. Prohibiting its use only serves to0 complicate the problem. Besides, marijuana has some medicinal value. Therefore, the solution lies in legalizing its use and coming up with necessary legislations to control its usage. This will enable research on the drug to go on and hence ensure the users of its quality. Furthermore, legalizing it will enable it to be used in hospitals .this will be a great stride towards alleviating some of the problems faced by certain kinds of patients as explained above. Buy custom Illegal Drugs essay

Why does J. A. Fodor think that there must be a language of thought Is Essay

Why does J. A. Fodor think that there must be a language of thought Is he right - Essay Example Specifically, Fodor advanced a notion of a language of thought. Fodor’s Language of Thought Hypothesis (LOTH) states that the thought process occurring in the mind is a symbolic system that parallels a language in structure. Jerry Fodor’s presented LOTH in his aptly titled book The Language of Thought (Fodor 1975). Through an examination the major platforms of the LOTH hypothesis, as well as prominent criticisms, this essay examines the extent that Fodor is successful in articulating the existence of a language of thought. Language of Thought Philosophers have formulated LOTH by considering the multiplicity of thoughts, or propositional attitudes. One can identify propositional attitudes in sentences like ‘A wishes that B’, or ‘A thinks that B’, or ‘A intends that B’. A is the subject of attitude, B is the sentence, and ‘that B’ is the proposition or the object of the attitude. If we say that C stands for verbs like â €˜wishes’, ‘thinks’, and ‘intends’, then the propositional attitude sentences would take the form: ‘A Cs that B’. Therefore, LOTH can be considered as a hypothesis that features how we create propositional attitudes in our ‘mental language’, and how we relate our thought and thinking with them. Our conceptual thinking takes place in a mental representation of language-like structure; however, this is not direct representation of spoken language. Rather, this ‘language of thought’ is a form of representation where the human mind perceives concepts and symbolizes them rather than using words for those concepts. Hence, the mind uses internal forms of representation, different from traditional linguistic ‘words’, to represent these concepts. Still, these symbols combine to form mental sentences, called the propositional attitudes, which are consistent with the grammatical rules of language. This conc eptual thinking has a computational nature that extracts thinking from processing the series of mental symbols according to algorithms. Representational Theory Jerry Fodor specifically implements representational theory in supporting his position (Fodor 1987). According to representational theory, thinking occurs in the form of symbols that are actually the propositional attitudes described earlier (Fodor 1987). While Fodor argues that propositional attitudes should be represented not only as symbols but also as a language, he believes this ‘language of thought’ is different from spoken and written languages like English, French or German (Fodor 1987). Consider the following: ‘I don’t want to eat ladyfingers, so I’d better tell mom to make me French fries.’ According to representational theory, there is a state of a section of this individual’s brain that represents his or her unwillingness to eat ladyfingers (Fodor 1987). There is anot her section of this individual’s brain that represents his or her way of avoiding ladyfingers; namely, to tell their mom to cook something else (Fodor 1987). Thirdly, there is a small piece of brain circuitry that is linking these two states and instigating an action (Fodor 1987). LOTH asserts that the representation of the decision in this example here has to be structured. That is, it has to be structured just like a sentence articulating that decision. Fodor’s LOTH further states that the structure of symbolic representation in the mind and the linguistic representation of that symbolic representation must be related. That is, the structure of the brain state matching the decision of eating French fries will be equivalent to the structure of the sentence articulating the decision. One considers another example: ‘There is a suspicion crossing my mind that a rat is under my bed’